Forums
DoWUK Clan Site :: Forums :: Public Area :: Ruckers Insane Rambles
 
<< Previous thread | Next thread >>
The Shining and the fake moon landings
Moderators: Administrator, Mobster, seantheman, Claymore, DazzerG, Ripper, M@vrik, Elvis, B!azey*
Author Post
Rucker
Thu Oct 22 2009, 11:27pm
rucker
Registered Member #14
Joined: Mon Apr 23 2007, 01:18pm
Posts: 1414
This is a wild and yet, interesting observation. This should interest Sean and some of you. Stanley Kubrick while filming the 2001: A Space Odyssey. Was asked to film the fake moon landings. The writer has in my view cleverly worked out how, through the Stephen King's novel, The Shining. Kubrick was trying to tell us the truth about the landings. Stay with it, its not that long. Theres a link first page to tell you more on Kubricks fake apollo 11 landings.

{DoWUK Link}
Back to top
seantheman
Fri Oct 23 2009, 01:19am
Leg-end

Registered Member #5
Joined: Thu Apr 19 2007, 09:02am
Posts: 2525
What a load of rubbish. Really, belongs in the daily star or mirror tbh.
Back to top
Rucker
Fri Oct 23 2009, 11:01am
rucker
Registered Member #14
Joined: Mon Apr 23 2007, 01:18pm
Posts: 1414
Did you read it all? And another thing give us a bit of courtesy. I managed to spend some time writing a bit so you and others had an idea what you was to see. Replyng with that sort of comment is damn right rude.?annoy. I expected better than that coming from you Sean.
For your infomation i have actual photographic evidence of hollywood back drops and land of the moon from that time. wether it was krubek or nasa or for a bloody nursery rythm its there, and up for debate.

[ Edited Fri Oct 23 2009, 11:16am ]
Back to top
Ripper
Fri Oct 23 2009, 04:53pm
ripper

Registered Member #18
Joined: Mon Apr 23 2007, 10:48pm
Posts: 1587
im not truly convinced of kubrick writting the shinning as aploy to give us the truth ....

but the evidence given by the writter to the doctoring of photos and the possible fact that man didnt land on the moon in 69 are appartant.... from Ruckers posted article:





If this was to happen, someon stand on the moon and take this photograph, you need to ask your self two questions : one Why is ther no spaceman in the shot? you have just travelled 285,000 miles and you take a photo of an empty buggy? and why again if you have travled all that far... why alter the photo when you get back? it doesnt make sense.

Im not going to go into detail but this photo is a fake .... we all know what a shadow is and we all know how they are projected.... look at the shadows from the buggy and the small craters in the background... the crater show light source from the left so why is the right hand side of the far mountian in blazing sunshine when in fact it should be in darkness?

Its an intresting read
Back to top
M@vrik
Fri Oct 23 2009, 10:54pm
The Website Guy

Registered Member #25
Joined: Sat Apr 28 2007, 05:56pm
Posts: 1853

mmmm, that was quite interesting Ruck, need to see what else there is on that one.

Rip, what the fuck you on? yes thats a fake, but where did you get the pic from?
If it's not a fake (never mind the shadows) where are the tracks from the wheels??
Back to top
seantheman
Sat Oct 24 2009, 12:46pm
Leg-end

Registered Member #5
Joined: Thu Apr 19 2007, 09:02am
Posts: 2525
Im not debating the fact that the moon landing was real or not. Just that Kubrick was sending hidden messages.
Why didn't he just say it publicly....the landings were fake. Why the need for a hidden message with clues
Back to top
Rucker
Sat Oct 24 2009, 09:02pm
rucker
Registered Member #14
Joined: Mon Apr 23 2007, 01:18pm
Posts: 1414
if you read the lot m8 you would know why, ie threats to his family etc. the nuke arms race with russia.
Back to top
 

Jump:     Back to top

Syndicate this thread: rss 0.92 Syndicate this thread: rss 2.0 Syndicate this thread: RDF
Powered by e107 Forum System
just using this to see if we can get a google index {DoWUK Link} or click here to get DoWUK into the ATI google listing ... {DoWUK Link}

{DoWUK Link}